[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231004185347.80880-25-jlayton@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 14:52:12 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 27/89] cramfs: convert to new timestamp accessors
Convert to using the new inode timestamp accessor functions.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
fs/cramfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
index 2fbf97077ce9..60dbfa0f8805 100644
--- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
@@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ static struct inode *get_cramfs_inode(struct super_block *sb,
}
/* Struct copy intentional */
- inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode,
- zerotime);
+ inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode,
+ inode_set_atime_to_ts(inode, inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, zerotime)));
/* inode->i_nlink is left 1 - arguably wrong for directories,
but it's the best we can do without reading the directory
contents. 1 yields the right result in GNU find, even
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists