linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH next] cgroup/cpuset: Cleanup signedness issue in cpu_exclusive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:59:21 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, error27@...il.com,
        kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] cgroup/cpuset: Cleanup signedness issue in
 cpu_exclusive_check()

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:58:01PM -0700, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> Smatch complains about returning negative error codes from a type
> bool function.
> 
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:705 cpu_exclusive_check() warn:
> 	signedness bug returning '(-22)'
> 
> The code works correctly, but it is confusing.  The current behavior is
> that cpu_exclusive_check() returns true if it's *NOT* exclusive.  Rename
> it to cpusets_are_exclusive() and reverse the returns so it returns true
> if it is exclusive and false if it's not.  Update both callers as well.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309201706.2LhKdM6o-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>

Applied to cgroup/for-6.7.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun