[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZR22CYkZCv52AmML@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:59:21 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, error27@...il.com,
kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] cgroup/cpuset: Cleanup signedness issue in
cpu_exclusive_check()
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:58:01PM -0700, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> Smatch complains about returning negative error codes from a type
> bool function.
>
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:705 cpu_exclusive_check() warn:
> signedness bug returning '(-22)'
>
> The code works correctly, but it is confusing. The current behavior is
> that cpu_exclusive_check() returns true if it's *NOT* exclusive. Rename
> it to cpusets_are_exclusive() and reverse the returns so it returns true
> if it is exclusive and false if it's not. Update both callers as well.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309201706.2LhKdM6o-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
Applied to cgroup/for-6.7.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists