linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM9d7chUnxjPdOwZZ0imYs+i8+dd9GL=O3gqJXzaRd1VGZJxBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:19:36 -0700
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review

Hello,

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:33 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>
> +Namhyung, Ian,
>
> On 10/4/23 10:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> perf fails to build with:
>
> fixdep: error opening depfile:
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/pmu-events/.pmu-events.o.d:
> No such file or directory
> make[5]: *** [pmu-events/Build:33:
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o]
> Error 2
> make[4]: *** [Makefile.perf:672:
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o]
> Error 2
> make[3]: *** [Makefile.perf:240: sub-make] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [package/pkg-generic.mk:294:
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-tools/.stamp_built]
> Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:27: _all] Error 2
>
> due a80fd00cb1a7793ead4d7c3fa7d3f1e898231c27 ("perf build: Update build
> rule for generated files"). Reverting that commit fixes the build for me
> and then all is good in terms of testing.

I think it's ok to drop the patches if it's not applied
cleanly.

Thanks,
Namhyung