lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 23:27:29 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yong He <zhuangel570@...il.com>,
        Neeraj upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] srcu fixes

Le Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 09:47:04AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> > The 10-hour 40-CPU SRCU-P run and pair of 10-hour 16-CPU SRCU-N runs
> > completed without failure.  The others had some failures, but I need
> > to look and see if any were unexpected.  In the meantime, I started a
> > two-hour 40-CPU SRCU-P run and a pair of one-hour 16-CPU SRCU-N runs on
> > just that first commit.  Also servicing SIGSHOWER and SIGFOOD.  ;-)
> 
> And the two-hour 40-CPU SRCU-P run and a pair of two-hour 16-CPU SRCU-N
> runs (on only the first commit) completed without incident.
> 
> The other set of overnight full-stack runs had only tick-stop errors,
> so I started a two-hour set on the first commit.
> 
> So far so good!

Very nice!

As for the tick-stop error, see the upstream fix:

   1a6a46477494 ("timers: Tag (hr)timer softirq as hotplug safe")

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ