[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZR30mNQEyRjzr0jm@google.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:26:16 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs-tools: use proper address entry count for direct
nodes
On 10/03, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
>
> For direct nodes, we have to use DEF_ADDRS_PER_BLOCK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> ---
> fsck/fsck.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
> index 78ffdb6..56a7d31 100644
> --- a/fsck/fsck.c
> +++ b/fsck/fsck.c
> @@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ static void fsck_failed_reconnect_file_dnode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> fsck->chk.valid_blk_cnt--;
> f2fs_clear_main_bitmap(sbi, ni.blk_addr);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ADDRS_PER_BLOCK(&node->i); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < DEF_ADDRS_PER_BLOCK; i++) {
It seems we need to use the inode block passing by fsck_failed_reconnect_file().
> addr = le32_to_cpu(node->dn.addr[i]);
> if (!addr)
> continue;
3012 fsck->chk.valid_blk_cnt--;
3013 if (addr == NEW_ADDR)
And, we also need to skip if addr == COMPRESS_ADDR here?
3014 continue;
3015 f2fs_clear_main_bitmap(sbi, addr);
3016 }
> --
> 2.42.0.582.g8ccd20d70d-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists