linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <607927885bb8ca12d4cd5787f01207c256cc8798.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 00:29:58 +0000
From:   "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>
CC:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
        "mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        "bjorn@...nel.org" <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "nadav.amit@...il.com" <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "hca@...ux.ibm.com" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "kent.overstreet@...ux.dev" <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        "puranjay12@...il.com" <puranjay12@...il.com>,
        "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        "chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        "tsbogend@...ha.franken.de" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "dinguyen@...nel.org" <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        "naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of
 module_alloc to execmem

On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 10:29 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> +
> +static void execmem_init_missing(struct execmem_params *p)
> +{
> +       struct execmem_range *default_range = &p-
> >ranges[EXECMEM_DEFAULT];
> +
> +       for (int i = EXECMEM_DEFAULT + 1; i < EXECMEM_TYPE_MAX; i++)
> {
> +               struct execmem_range *r = &p->ranges[i];
> +
> +               if (!r->start) {
> +                       r->pgprot = default_range->pgprot;
> +                       r->alignment = default_range->alignment;
> +                       r->start = default_range->start;
> +                       r->end = default_range->end;
> +               }
> +       }
> +}
> +

It seems a bit weird to copy all of this. Is it trying to be faster or
something?

Couldn't it just check r->start in execmem_text/data_alloc() path and
switch to EXECMEM_DEFAULT if needed then? The execmem_range_is_data()
part that comes later could be added to the logic there too. So this
seems like unnecessary complexity to me or I don't see the reason.