lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZR0R3rM1G0nOL3jM@matsya>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 12:48:54 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the dmaengine
 tree

Hello Frank,

On 02-10-23, 16:26, Frank Li wrote:
> > On 29-09-23, 13:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the dmaengine tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > ld: warning: discarding dynamic section .glink
> > > ld: warning: discarding dynamic section .plt
> > > ld: linkage table error against `ioread64'
> > > ld: stubs don't match calculated size
> > > ld: can not build stubs: bad value
> > > ld: fs/debugfs/file.o: in function `debugfs_print_regs':
> > > file.c:(.text+0xee8): undefined reference to `ioread64be'
> > > ld: file.c:(.text+0xf50): undefined reference to `ioread64'
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >   09289d0ad122 ("debugfs_create_regset32() support 8/16/64 bit width
> > registers")
> > >
> > > I have used the dmaengine tree from next-20230928 for today.
> > 
> > Thanks for report, I have dropped offending commits for now.
> 
> Fixed patch already post at
> https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20231002145737.538934-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com/T/#u

I am not sure of this fix, someone has to pick this. let this get fixed
first and we can always pick back these patches.

My tree was broken meanwhile impacting others, so it was better to drop
for now.

Thanks for you understanding

-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ