| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZR0bqBbvM+hHOPXX@gofer.mess.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 09:00:40 +0100
From: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
To: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: pwm-ir-tx: trigger edges from hrtimer
interrupt context
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 09:16:53AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> On 1.10.23 г. 13:40 ч., Sean Young wrote:
> > The pwm-ir-tx driver has to turn the pwm signal on and off, and suffers
> > from delays as this is done in process context. Make this work in atomic
> > context.
> >
> > This makes the driver much more precise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
> > Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
>
> what about the following patch(not a proper one, just RFC)? It achieves the
> same (if not better) precision (on n900 at least) without using atomic pwm.
> What it does is: create a fifo thread in which we swicth pwm on/off, start
> hrtimer that is used to signal thread when to switch pwm.
> As signal comes earlier than needed(because hrtimer runs async to the
> thread), we do a busy loop wait for the precise time to switch the pwm. At
> least on n900, this busy loop is less than 200 us per switch(worst case,
> usually it is less than 100 us). That way, even if we have some latency
> spike, it is covered by not doing busy loop for that particular pwm switch
> and we keep the precise timing.
I think this is a good idea.
> Maybe we shall merge both patches so fifo thread to be used for sleeping
> pwms and hrtimer for atomic. I can do that and test it here if you think
> that approach makes sense.
Let's try and merge this patch for the next merge window, and worry about
the atomic version after that. We've already queued the ir-rx51 removal
patches to media_stage so it would be nice to have to revert these patches,
and improve pwm-ir-tx for the next kernel release.
I'll test your patch, in the mean time would you mind posting this patch
as a proper patch (with review comments below addressed)?
Thanks,
Sean
>
> Regards,
> Ivo
>
> PS: I have a patch that converts timer-ti-dm to non-sleeping one, will send
> it when it comes to it.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> index 105a9c24f1e3..e8b620f53056 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -17,8 +18,16 @@
>
> struct pwm_ir {
> struct pwm_device *pwm;
> + struct hrtimer timer;
> + struct task_struct *tx_thread;
> + wait_queue_head_t tx_wq;
> + struct completion tx_done;
> + struct completion edge;
> unsigned int carrier;
> unsigned int duty_cycle;
> + unsigned int *txbuf;
> + unsigned int count;
> + unsigned int index;
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id pwm_ir_of_match[] = {
> @@ -48,35 +57,103 @@ static int pwm_ir_set_carrier(struct rc_dev *dev, u32
> carrier)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> - unsigned int count)
> +static enum hrtimer_restart pwm_ir_timer_cb(struct hrtimer *timer)
> +{
> + struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = container_of(timer, struct pwm_ir, timer);
> + ktime_t now;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we happen to hit an odd latency spike, loop through the
> + * pulses until we catch up.
> + */
> + do {
> + u64 edge;
> +
> + if (pwm_ir->index >= pwm_ir->count)
> + goto out;
Might as well avoid the goto and put the complete and return in the body of
the if.
> +
> + complete(&pwm_ir->edge);
> +
> + edge = US_TO_NS(pwm_ir->txbuf[pwm_ir->index]);
> + hrtimer_add_expires_ns(timer, edge);
> +
> + pwm_ir->index++;
> +
> + now = timer->base->get_time();
> +
> + } while (hrtimer_get_expires_tv64(timer) < now);
> +
> + return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> +out:
> + complete(&pwm_ir->edge);
> +
> + return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> +}
> +
> +static void _pwm_ir_tx(struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir)
> {
> - struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = dev->priv;
> - struct pwm_device *pwm = pwm_ir->pwm;
> struct pwm_state state;
> int i;
> ktime_t edge;
> long delta;
>
> - pwm_init_state(pwm, &state);
> + pwm_init_state(pwm_ir->pwm, &state);
>
> state.period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, pwm_ir->carrier);
> pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, pwm_ir->duty_cycle, 100);
>
> + hrtimer_start(&pwm_ir->timer, 0, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> + wait_for_completion(&pwm_ir->edge);
> edge = ktime_get();
>
> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < pwm_ir->count; i++) {
> state.enabled = !(i % 2);
> - pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
> + pwm_apply_state(pwm_ir->pwm, &state);
> +
> + edge = ktime_add_us(edge, pwm_ir->txbuf[i]);
> + wait_for_completion(&pwm_ir->edge);
>
> - edge = ktime_add_us(edge, txbuf[i]);
> delta = ktime_us_delta(edge, ktime_get());
> +
> if (delta > 0)
> - usleep_range(delta, delta + 10);
> + udelay(delta);
> }
>
> state.enabled = false;
> - pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
> + pwm_apply_state(pwm_ir->pwm, &state);
> +
> + pwm_ir->count = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pwm_ir_thread(void *data)
> +{
> + struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = data;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + wait_event_idle(pwm_ir->tx_wq,
> + kthread_should_stop() || pwm_ir->count);
> +
> + if (kthread_should_stop())
> + break;
> +
> + _pwm_ir_tx(pwm_ir);
> + complete(&pwm_ir->tx_done);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> + unsigned int count)
> +{
> + struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = dev->priv;
> +
> + pwm_ir->txbuf = txbuf;
> + pwm_ir->count = count;
> + pwm_ir->index = 0;
> +
> + wake_up(&pwm_ir->tx_wq);
> + wait_for_completion(&pwm_ir->tx_done);
>
> return count;
> }
> @@ -91,12 +168,24 @@ static int pwm_ir_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!pwm_ir)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm_ir);
> +
> + pwm_ir->count = 0;
> +
> pwm_ir->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(pwm_ir->pwm))
> return PTR_ERR(pwm_ir->pwm);
>
> - pwm_ir->carrier = 38000;
> + init_waitqueue_head(&pwm_ir->tx_wq);
> + init_completion(&pwm_ir->edge);
> + init_completion(&pwm_ir->tx_done);
> +
> + hrtimer_init(&pwm_ir->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> + pwm_ir->timer.function = pwm_ir_timer_cb;
> +
> pwm_ir->duty_cycle = 50;
> + pwm_ir->carrier = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(pwm_get_period(pwm_ir->pwm),
> + NSEC_PER_SEC);
>
> rcdev = devm_rc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev, RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW_TX);
> if (!rcdev)
> @@ -109,15 +198,38 @@ static int pwm_ir_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> rcdev->s_tx_duty_cycle = pwm_ir_set_duty_cycle;
> rcdev->s_tx_carrier = pwm_ir_set_carrier;
>
> + pwm_ir->tx_thread = kthread_create(pwm_ir_thread, pwm_ir, "%s/tx",
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> + if (IS_ERR(pwm_ir->tx_thread))
> + return PTR_ERR(pwm_ir->tx_thread);
> +
> + sched_set_fifo(pwm_ir->tx_thread);
> + wake_up_process(pwm_ir->tx_thread);
This means the thread is always around. How about creating the thread
per-tx?
> +
> rc = devm_rc_register_device(&pdev->dev, rcdev);
> - if (rc < 0)
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + kthread_stop(pwm_ir->tx_thread);
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register rc device\n");
> + }
>
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static int pwm_ir_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + if (pwm_ir->tx_thread) {
> + kthread_stop(pwm_ir->tx_thread);
> + pwm_ir->tx_thread = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct platform_driver pwm_ir_driver = {
> .probe = pwm_ir_probe,
> + .remove = pwm_ir_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(pwm_ir_of_match),
Powered by blists - more mailing lists