[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUdRgM0E0QNU5k=u2kHdX1B26+C2N3paqb+EqeGcQayBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:08:29 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, magnus.damm@...il.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
quic_bjorande@...cinc.com, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com,
biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/28] clk: renesas: rzg2l: fix computation formula
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 7:39 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev> wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>
> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf)
> the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows:
>
> Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s)
>
> and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with
> integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight
> differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus,
> get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536.
>
> Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - used mul_u64_u32_shr()
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
i.e. will queue in renesas-clk-for-v6.7.
> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> @@ -695,18 +695,18 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw);
> struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv;
> unsigned int val1, val2;
> - unsigned int mult = 1;
> - unsigned int div = 1;
> + u64 rate;
>
> if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL)
> return parent_rate;
>
> val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf));
> val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf));
> - mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536;
> - div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2);
>
> - return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div);
> + rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16) + (s16)KDIV(val1),
As KDIV() is always a signed number, I will move the cast to s16 to
the definition of KDIV() while applying.
> + 16 + SDIV(val2));
> +
> + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, PDIV(val1));
> }
>
> static const struct clk_ops rzg2l_cpg_pll_ops = {
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists