[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdtdS6+8TL1edRzu_=ZT3mgfRud1YEx9ZAQcYprUj+yew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:49:25 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/36] pinctrl: remove old GPIO helpers
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:21 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:51 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Old variants of pinctrl GPIO helpers are no longer used. Let's remove
> > them as well as convert all static functions in pinctrl/core.c that
> > still deal with global GPIO numbers to using the gpio_chip + offset
> > pairs.
>
> This patch does three thighs as I see it.
>
I'd argue it just fold the code that lived in old functions into the new ones...
> First of all, it silently converts to RAII. Please, do this separately.
... and while at it, it already switches to SBRM because why copy outdated code.
> Second, it shuffles a lot of code between old and new implementations.
> What I prefer to see is what the subject tells: only "-" (minus)
> lines.
> Third, it will become easier if you name the "new" functions better to
> begin with, it will help a lot here.
>
I'll wait for Linus to tell me if he prefers one big squashed commit
or a fine-grained history (I prefer the latter) before spending time
splitting this commit.
Bart
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists