[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231004092131.GG34982@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 12:21:31 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: Check for valid console index
* Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> [231004 09:13]:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > * Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> [231004 09:05]:
> > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let's not allow negative numbers for console index.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> > > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> > > > @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static int univ8250_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options)
> > > > * if so, search for the first available port that does have
> > > > * console support.
> > > > */
> > > > - if (co->index >= UART_NR)
> > > > + if (co->index < 0 || co->index >= UART_NR)
> > > > co->index = 0;
> > >
> > > The inconsistencies how different serial drivers handle this situation
> > > seem staggering. Perhaps there should be some effort to make the behavior
> > > uniform across them?
> >
> > Hmm yeah we should just have them all check for co->index < 0.
>
> Right but it's only about that, some return -Exx codes (more than one -Exx
> variant) and some do assign just 0 like here.
What do you have in mind then? They should all assume co->index < 0 is an
invalid console index still, right :)
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists