[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86jzs2ofqs.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:15:39 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW
On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:59:50 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> Given you haven't seen any issues, I suspect those are getting reset to fixed
> values that happens to work out for us, but it is a bit worrisome more
> generally (e.g. the LPI case above).
It is likely that these SoCs don't even have an ITS.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists