[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MeBKovkC-VbvWNJWk_UjU4FGguEW7gy=L-2saA7kiPijQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:59:31 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timestamp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 15/21] arm: omap1: ams-delta: stop using gpiochip_find()
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:53 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> gpiochip_find() is going away as it's not hot-unplug safe. This platform
> is not affected by any of the related problems as this GPIO controller
> cannot really go away but in order to finally remove this function, we
> need to convert it to using gpio_device_find() as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c | 36 +++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c
> index 9808cd27e2cf..a28ea6ac1eba 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c
> @@ -560,22 +560,6 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table *ams_delta_gpio_tables[] __initdata = {
> &ams_delta_nand_gpio_table,
> };
>
> -/*
> - * Some drivers may not use GPIO lookup tables but need to be provided
> - * with GPIO numbers. The same applies to GPIO based IRQ lines - some
> - * drivers may even not use GPIO layer but expect just IRQ numbers.
> - * We could either define GPIO lookup tables then use them on behalf
> - * of those devices, or we can use GPIO driver level methods for
> - * identification of GPIO and IRQ numbers. For the purpose of the latter,
> - * defina a helper function which identifies GPIO chips by their labels.
> - */
> -static int gpiochip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
> -{
> - char *label = data;
> -
> - return !strcmp(label, chip->label);
> -}
> -
> static struct gpiod_hog ams_delta_gpio_hogs[] = {
> GPIO_HOG(LATCH2_LABEL, LATCH2_PIN_KEYBRD_DATAOUT, "keybrd_dataout",
> GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, GPIOD_OUT_LOW),
> @@ -615,14 +599,28 @@ static void __init modem_assign_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> */
> static void __init omap_gpio_deps_init(void)
> {
> + struct gpio_device *gdev;
> struct gpio_chip *chip;
>
> - chip = gpiochip_find(OMAP_GPIO_LABEL, gpiochip_match_by_label);
> - if (!chip) {
> - pr_err("%s: OMAP GPIO chip not found\n", __func__);
> + /*
> + * Some drivers may not use GPIO lookup tables but need to be provided
> + * with GPIO numbers. The same applies to GPIO based IRQ lines - some
> + * drivers may even not use GPIO layer but expect just IRQ numbers.
> + * We could either define GPIO lookup tables then use them on behalf
> + * of those devices, or we can use GPIO driver level methods for
> + * identification of GPIO and IRQ numbers.
> + *
> + * This reference will be leaked but that's alright as this device
> + * never goes down.
> + */
> + gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label(OMAP_GPIO_LABEL);
> + if (!gdev) {
> + pr_err("%s: OMAP GPIO device not found\n", __func__);
> return;
> }
>
> + chip = gpio_device_get_chip(gdev);
> +
> /*
> * Start with FIQ initialization as it may have to request
> * and release successfully each OMAP GPIO pin in turn.
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Patch applied, thanks!
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists