lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231004123454.15691-17-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed,  4 Oct 2023 14:34:45 +0200
From:   Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 16/25] timer: Keep the pinned timers separate from the others

Separate the storage space for pinned timers. Deferrable timers (doesn't
matter if pinned or non pinned) are still enqueued into their own base.

This is preparatory work for changing the NOHZ timer placement from a push
at enqueue time to a pull at expiry time model.

Originally-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <richardcochran@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
v6:
  - Drop set TIMER_PINNED flag in add_timer_on() and drop related
    warning. add_timer_on() fix is splitted into a separate
    patch. Therefore also drop "Reviewed-by" of Frederic Weisbecker

v5:
  - Add WARN_ONCE() in add_timer_on()
  - Decrease patch size by splitting into three patches (this patch and the
    two before)

v4:
  - split out logic to forward base clock into a helper function
    forward_base_clk() (Frederic)
  - ease the code in run_local_timers() and timer_clear_idle() (Frederic)
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 7468a805d302..1cd214c2f3f1 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -187,12 +187,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies_64);
 #define WHEEL_SIZE	(LVL_SIZE * LVL_DEPTH)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
-# define NR_BASES	2
-# define BASE_STD	0
-# define BASE_DEF	1
+/*
+ * If multiple bases need to be locked, use the base ordering for lock
+ * nesting, i.e. lowest number first.
+ */
+# define NR_BASES	3
+# define BASE_LOCAL	0
+# define BASE_GLOBAL	1
+# define BASE_DEF	2
 #else
 # define NR_BASES	1
-# define BASE_STD	0
+# define BASE_LOCAL	0
+# define BASE_GLOBAL	0
 # define BASE_DEF	0
 #endif
 
@@ -899,7 +905,10 @@ static int detach_if_pending(struct timer_list *timer, struct timer_base *base,
 
 static inline struct timer_base *get_timer_cpu_base(u32 tflags, u32 cpu)
 {
-	struct timer_base *base = per_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD], cpu);
+	int index = tflags & TIMER_PINNED ? BASE_LOCAL : BASE_GLOBAL;
+	struct timer_base *base;
+
+	base = per_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[index], cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * If the timer is deferrable and NO_HZ_COMMON is set then we need
@@ -912,7 +921,10 @@ static inline struct timer_base *get_timer_cpu_base(u32 tflags, u32 cpu)
 
 static inline struct timer_base *get_timer_this_cpu_base(u32 tflags)
 {
-	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+	int index = tflags & TIMER_PINNED ? BASE_LOCAL : BASE_GLOBAL;
+	struct timer_base *base;
+
+	base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[index]);
 
 	/*
 	 * If the timer is deferrable and NO_HZ_COMMON is set then we need
@@ -1960,13 +1972,31 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej,
-						       struct timer_base *base)
+						       struct timer_base *base_local,
+						       struct timer_base *base_global)
 {
-	unsigned long nextevt;
+	unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
+	bool local_first;
 
-	nextevt = next_timer_interrupt(base);
+	nextevt_local = next_timer_interrupt(base_local);
+	nextevt_global = next_timer_interrupt(base_global);
 
-	if (base->timers_pending) {
+	/*
+	 * Check whether the local event is expiring before or at the same
+	 * time as the global event.
+	 *
+	 * Note, that nextevt_global and nextevt_local might be based on
+	 * different base->clk values. So it's not guaranteed that
+	 * comparing with empty bases results in a correct local_first.
+	 */
+	if (base_local->timers_pending && base_global->timers_pending)
+		local_first = time_before_eq(nextevt_local, nextevt_global);
+	else
+		local_first = base_local->timers_pending;
+
+	nextevt = local_first ? nextevt_local : nextevt_global;
+
+	if (base_local->timers_pending || base_global->timers_pending) {
 		/* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
 		if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
 			nextevt = basej;
@@ -1985,7 +2015,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej,
  */
 u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
 {
-	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+	struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
 	u64 expires = KTIME_MAX;
 	unsigned long nextevt;
 
@@ -1996,9 +2026,16 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
 	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
 		return expires;
 
-	raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
-	nextevt = __get_next_timer_interrupt(basej, base);
-	raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock);
+	base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
+	base_global = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]);
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&base_local->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
+	nextevt = __get_next_timer_interrupt(basej, base_local, base_global);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);
 
 	expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
 
@@ -2018,7 +2055,7 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
  */
 u64 timer_set_idle(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, bool *idle)
 {
-	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+	struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
 	unsigned long nextevt;
 
 	/*
@@ -2030,25 +2067,35 @@ u64 timer_set_idle(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, bool *idle)
 		return KTIME_MAX;
 	}
 
-	raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
-	nextevt = __get_next_timer_interrupt(basej, base);
+	base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
+	base_global = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]);
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&base_local->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
+	nextevt = __get_next_timer_interrupt(basej, base_local, base_global);
 
 	/*
 	 * We have a fresh next event. Check whether we can forward the
 	 * base.
 	 */
-	__forward_timer_base(base, basej);
+	__forward_timer_base(base_local, basej);
+	__forward_timer_base(base_global, basej);
 
 	/*
-	 * Base is idle if the next event is more than a tick away. Also
+	 * Bases are idle if the next event is more than a tick away. Also
 	 * the tick is stopped so any added timer must forward the base clk
 	 * itself to keep granularity small. This idle logic is only
-	 * maintained for the BASE_STD base, deferrable timers may still
-	 * see large granularity skew (by design).
+	 * maintained for the BASE_LOCAL and BASE_GLOBAL base, deferrable
+	 * timers may still see large granularity skew (by design).
 	 */
-	base->is_idle = *idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
+	*idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
+
+	/* We need to mark both bases in sync */
+	base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = *idle;
 
-	raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);
 
 	return basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
 }
@@ -2060,15 +2107,14 @@ u64 timer_set_idle(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, bool *idle)
  */
 void timer_clear_idle(void)
 {
-	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
-
 	/*
 	 * We do this unlocked. The worst outcome is a remote enqueue sending
 	 * a pointless IPI, but taking the lock would just make the window for
 	 * sending the IPI a few instructions smaller for the cost of taking
 	 * the lock in the exit from idle path.
 	 */
-	base->is_idle = false;
+	__this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL].is_idle, false);
+	__this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL].is_idle, false);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -2114,11 +2160,13 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
  */
 static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
 {
-	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
 
 	__run_timers(base);
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)) {
+		__run_timers(this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]));
 		__run_timers(this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_DEF]));
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2126,7 +2174,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
  */
 static void run_local_timers(void)
 {
-	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
 
 	hrtimer_run_queues();
 
-- 
2.39.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ