[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169643348853.2504487.15808600653362880318.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 17:49:15 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: lenb@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, Oza Pawandeep <quic_poza@...cinc.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast timer
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 10:33:33 -0700, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> ArmĀ® Functional Fixed Hardware Specification defines LPI states,
> which provide an architectural context loss flags field that can
> be used to describe the context that might be lost when an LPI
> state is entered.
>
> - Core context Lost
> - General purpose registers.
> - Floating point and SIMD registers.
> - System registers, include the System register based
> - generic timer for the core.
> - Debug register in the core power domain.
> - PMU registers in the core power domain.
> - Trace register in the core power domain.
> - Trace context loss
> - GICR
> - GICD
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast timer
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/4785aa802853
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists