[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91ee347e-0654-48f4-b1ea-8cf752cabe20@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 14:15:21 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "drm/amd/pm: workaround for the wrong ac
power detection on smu 13.0.0"
On 10/5/2023 14:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> This reverts commit 0e5e1a84f0b8c814d502a135824244127fed8f23.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>
> No explaination as to why this needs to be reverted? And does this need
> to be backported anywhere?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
No need to be backported anywhere. The commit is only in
amd-staging-drm-next right now.
I think it's up to whether Alex includes the workaround commit in the
final 6.7 pull request. If he does, then yeah this could use a larger
write up to explain why it went in and out.
I was sort of thinking we could land both commits amd-staging-drm-next
and then when Alex did the pull request the workaround commit just
wouldn't be part of the 6.7 PR since it's a no-op with the revert.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists