linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 15/18] x86/sgx: Prepare for multiple LRUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <op.2ccwmcljwjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 05 Oct 2023 14:33:38 -0500
From:   "Haitao Huang" <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
        "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     "kristen@...ux.intel.com" <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "yangjie@...rosoft.com" <yangjie@...rosoft.com>,
        "Li, Zhiquan1" <zhiquan1.li@...el.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com" <mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Zhang, Bo" <zhanb@...rosoft.com>,
        "anakrish@...rosoft.com" <anakrish@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/18] x86/sgx: Prepare for multiple LRUs

On Thu, 05 Oct 2023 07:30:46 -0500, Huang, Kai <kai.huang@...el.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
>> +static inline struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *sgx_lru_lists(struct  
>> sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
>> +{
>> +	return &sgx_global_lru;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool sgx_can_reclaim(void)
>> +{
>> +	return !list_empty(&sgx_global_lru.reclaimable);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Shouldn't sgx_can_reclaim() also take a 'struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *'?
>
> I thought we also need to check whether a cgroup's LRU lists can be  
> reclaimed?

This is only used to check if any pages reclaimable at the top level in  
this file. Later sgx_epc_cgroup_lru_empty(NULL) is used in this function  
to recursively check all cgroups starting from the root.

Haitao