[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <696fc488-63d3-444c-a9f2-14d7a7379143@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 15:30:52 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: paulmck@...nel.org,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: nolibc changes since 6.6-rc1 for linux-next
On 10/5/23 14:58, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:28:05PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>> On 2023-10-05 14:15:31-0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On 10/5/23 11:00, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>>> Hi Shuah,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to test the current state of nolibc in linux-next.
>>>> Could pull the request below into your nolibc branch?
>>>>
>>>> I'll do some manual tests this weekend, too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit 0bb80ecc33a8fb5a682236443c1e740d5c917d1d:
>>>>
>>>> Linux 6.6-rc1 (2023-09-10 16:28:41 -0700)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git nolibc/next
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to ab663cc32912914258bc8a2fbd0e753f552ee9d8:
>>>>
>>>> tools/nolibc: automatically detect necessity to use pselect6 (2023-09-28 09:20:35 +0200)
>>>
>>> Absolutely. Do you mind tagging and pushing the tag and send
>>> pull request with the tag?
>>
>> Sure, here it is:
>>
>>
>> The following changes since commit 0bb80ecc33a8fb5a682236443c1e740d5c917d1d:
>>
>> Linux 6.6-rc1 (2023-09-10 16:28:41 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git nolibc-next.2023.10.05a
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to ab663cc32912914258bc8a2fbd0e753f552ee9d8:
>>
>> tools/nolibc: automatically detect necessity to use pselect6 (2023-09-28 09:20:35 +0200)
>
> Looks good on my laptop:
>
> make run:
>
> 160 test(s): 160 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
>
> make run-user:
>
> 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
>
> Shuah, I can take nolibc for the upcoming merge window (I believe that
> it is my turn to do so), but if you would prefer to take them, that also
> works for me. Either way, just let me know.
>
Yes it is your turn. Please go ahead and take them.
I will pull and do testing and update you on how it went.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists