[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5EScqnGZtG8J_sCDzHCrS3maPVg-V7T6G5ofWpTKJihBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:56:50 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/7] NVMEM cells in sysfs
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 6:22 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As part of a previous effort, support for dynamic NVMEM layouts was
> brought into mainline, helping a lot in getting information from NVMEM
> devices at non-static locations. One common example of NVMEM cell is the
> MAC address that must be used. Sometimes the cell content is mainly (or
> only) useful to the kernel, and sometimes it is not. Users might also
> want to know the content of cells such as: the manufacturing place and
> date, the hardware version, the unique ID, etc. Two possibilities in
> this case: either the users re-implement their own parser to go through
> the whole device and search for the information they want, or the kernel
> can expose the content of the cells if deemed relevant. This second
> approach sounds way more relevant than the first one to avoid useless
> code duplication, so here is a series bringing NVMEM cells content to
> the user through sysfs.
>
> Here is a real life example with a Marvell Armada 7040 TN48m switch:
>
> $ nvmem=/sys/bus/nvmem/devices/1-00563/
> $ for i in `ls -1 $nvmem/cells/*`; do basename $i; hexdump -C $i | head -n1; done
> country-code@77
> 00000000 54 57 |TW|
> crc32@88
> 00000000 bb cd 51 98 |..Q.|
> device-version@49
> 00000000 02 |.|
> diag-version@80
> 00000000 56 31 2e 30 2e 30 |V1.0.0|
> label-revision@4c
> 00000000 44 31 |D1|
> mac-address@2c
> 00000000 18 be 92 13 9a 00 |......|
> manufacture-date@34
> 00000000 30 32 2f 32 34 2f 32 30 32 31 20 31 38 3a 35 39 |02/24/2021 18:59|
> manufacturer@72
> 00000000 44 4e 49 |DNI|
> num-macs@6e
> 00000000 00 40 |.@|
> onie-version@61
> 00000000 32 30 32 30 2e 31 31 2d 56 30 31 |2020.11-V01|
> platform-name@50
> 00000000 38 38 46 37 30 34 30 2f 38 38 46 36 38 32 30 |88F7040/88F6820|
> product-name@d
> 00000000 54 4e 34 38 4d 2d 50 2d 44 4e |TN48M-P-DN|
> serial-number@19
> 00000000 54 4e 34 38 31 50 32 54 57 32 30 34 32 30 33 32 |TN481P2TW2042032|
> vendor@7b
> 00000000 44 4e 49 |DNI|
>
> Current support does not include:
> * The knowledge of the type of data (binary vs. ASCII), so by default
> all cells are exposed in binary form.
> * Write support.
>
> Changes in v11:
> * The nvmem layouts are now regular devices and not platform devices
> anymore. They are registered into the nvmem-layout bus (so there is a
> new /sysfs/bus/nvmem-layouts entry that gets created. All the code for
> this new bus is located under drivers/nvmem/layouts.c and is part of
> the main core. The core device-driver logic applies without too much
> additional code besides the registration of the bus and a bit of
> glue. I see no need for more detailed structures for now but this can
> be improved later as needed.
>
> Changes in v10:
> * All preparation patches have been picked-up by Srinivas.
> * Rebased on top of v6.6-rc1.
> * Fix an error path in the probe due to the recent additions.
>
> Changes in v9:
> * Hopefully fixed the creation of sysfs entries when describing the
> cells using the legacy layout, as reported by Chen-Yu.
> * Dropped the nvmem-specific device list and used the driver core list
> instead as advised by Greg.
>
> Changes in v8:
> * Fix a compilation warning whith !CONFIG_NVMEM_SYSFS.
> * Add a patch to return NULL when no layout is found (reported by Dan
> Carpenter).
> * Fixed the documentation as well as the cover letter regarding the
> addition of addresses in the cell names.
>
> Changes in v7:
> * Rework the layouts registration mechanism to use the platform devices
> logic.
> * Fix the two issues reported by Daniel Golle and Chen-Yu Tsai, one of
> them consist in suffixing '@<offset>' to the cell name to create the
> sysfs files in order to be sure they are all unique.
> * Update the doc.
>
> Changes in v6:
> * ABI documentation style fixes reported by Randy Dunlap:
> s|cells/ folder|"cells" folder|
> Missing period at the end of the final note.
> s|Ex::|Example::|
> * Remove spurious patch from the previous resubmission.
>
> Resending v5:
> * I forgot the mailing list in my former submission, both are absolutely
> identical otherwise.
>
> Changes in v5:
> * Rebased on last -rc1, fixing a conflict and skipping the first two
> patches already taken by Greg.
> * Collected tags from Greg.
> * Split the nvmem patch into two, one which just moves the cells
> creation and the other which adds the cells.
>
> Changes in v4:
> * Use a core helper to count the number of cells in a list.
> * Provide sysfs attributes a private member which is the entry itself to
> avoid the need for looking up the nvmem device and then looping over
> all the cells to find the right one.
>
> Changes in v3:
> * Patch 1 is new: fix a style issue which bothered me when reading the
> core.
> * Patch 2 is new: Don't error out when an attribute group does not
> contain any attributes, it's easier for developers to handle "empty"
> directories this way. It avoids strange/bad solutions to be
> implemented and does not cost much.
> * Drop the is_visible hook as it is no longer needed.
> * Stop allocating an empty attribute array to comply with the sysfs core
> checks (this check has been altered in the first commits).
> * Fix a missing tab in the ABI doc.
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Do not mention the cells might become writable in the future in the
> ABI documentation.
> * Fix a wrong return value reported by Dan and kernel test robot.
> * Implement .is_bin_visible().
> * Avoid overwriting the list of attribute groups, but keep the cells
> attribute group writable as we need to populate it at run time.
> * Improve the commit messages.
> * Give a real life example in the cover letter.
>
> Miquel Raynal (7):
> of: device: Export of_device_make_bus_id()
> nvmem: Clarify the situation when there is no DT node available
> nvmem: Move of_nvmem_layout_get_container() in another header
> nvmem: Create a header for internal sharing
> nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
> ABI: sysfs-nvmem-cells: Expose cells through sysfs
> nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
on a Juniper (MT8183) Chromebook. Note that this device uses the legacy
layout format.
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-nvmem-cells | 21 ++
> drivers/nvmem/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 308 +++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/nvmem/internals.h | 40 +++
> drivers/nvmem/layouts.c | 171 +++++++++++
> drivers/nvmem/layouts/onie-tlv.c | 37 ++-
> drivers/nvmem/layouts/sl28vpd.c | 37 ++-
> drivers/of/device.c | 41 +++
> drivers/of/platform.c | 40 ---
> include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h | 7 -
> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 38 ++-
> include/linux/of_device.h | 6 +
> 12 files changed, 614 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-nvmem-cells
> create mode 100644 drivers/nvmem/internals.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists