linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8939-huawei-kiwi: Add initial device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <284103cfa6bc312ccf12a552dd61d12108fabfbd.camel@aceart.de>
Date:   Thu, 05 Oct 2023 16:20:57 +0200
From:   lukas walter <lukas.walter@...art.de>
To:     konrad.dybcio@...aro.org
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lukas.walter@...art.de, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        raymondhackley@...tonmail.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8939-huawei-kiwi: Add initial
 device tree

>> Is this fine?
>> Should I send a V2 with the signoff and reserved-memory changes?
>I don't quite get it, what signoff?

Krzysztof noticed that the Signed-off-by are in the wrong order.
But I was told this alone is not worth a V2.