linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/321] 6.5.6-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231005073408.6bb52351@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2023 07:34:08 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, chuck.lever@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/321] 6.5.6-rc1 review

It'd probably make sense to run the path to the test that's failing
thru get_maintainer and throw the right people on the CC. Adding Chuck.

On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:25:24 +0530 Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.5.6 release.
> > There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.5.6-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.5.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h  
> 
> While running kunit testing on qemu-armv7 following test failures noticed
> on stable rc 6.5.6-rc1.
> 
> # req_destroy works: EXPECTATION FAILED at net/handshake/handshake-test.c:477
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> Test log:
> ----------
> <6>[ 1351.687335]     KTAP version 1
> <6>[ 1351.688300]     # Subtest: Handshake API tests
> <6>[ 1351.688760]     1..11
> <6>[ 1351.689362]         KTAP version 1
> <6>[ 1351.689985]         # Subtest: req_alloc API fuzzing
> <6>[ 1351.694360]         ok 1 handshake_req_alloc NULL proto
> <6>[ 1351.705855]         ok 2 handshake_req_alloc CLASS_NONE
> <6>[ 1351.710878]         ok 3 handshake_req_alloc CLASS_MAX
> <6>[ 1351.715435]         ok 4 handshake_req_alloc no callbacks
> <6>[ 1351.722026]         ok 5 handshake_req_alloc no done callback
> <6>[ 1351.726579]         ok 6 handshake_req_alloc excessive privsize
> <6>[ 1351.732397]         ok 7 handshake_req_alloc all good
> <6>[ 1351.732934]     # req_alloc API fuzzing: pass:7 fail:0 skip:0 total:7
> <6>[ 1351.733586]     ok 1 req_alloc API fuzzing
> <6>[ 1351.741251]     ok 2 req_submit NULL req arg
> <6>[ 1351.745979]     ok 3 req_submit NULL sock arg
> <6>[ 1351.753307]     ok 4 req_submit NULL sock->file
> <6>[ 1351.763090]     ok 5 req_lookup works
> <6>[ 1351.770057]     ok 6 req_submit max pending
> <6>[ 1351.774878]     ok 7 req_submit multiple
> <6>[ 1351.782411]     ok 8 req_cancel before accept
> <6>[ 1351.787423]     ok 9 req_cancel after accept
> <6>[ 1351.795660]     ok 10 req_cancel after done
> <3>[ 1351.799741]     # req_destroy works: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> net/handshake/handshake-test.c:477
> <3>[ 1351.799741]     Expected handshake_req_destroy_test == req, but
> <3>[ 1351.799741]         handshake_req_destroy_test == 00000000
> <3>[ 1351.799741]         req == cae22700
> <6>[ 1351.803368]     not ok 11 req_destroy works
> <6>[ 1351.804539] # Handshake API tests: pass:10 fail:1 skip:0 total:11
> <6>[ 1351.805460] # Totals: pass:16 fail:1 skip:0 total:17
> <6>[ 1351.806276] not ok 95 Handshake API tests
> 
> Links:
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.5.y/build/v6.5.5-322-g9327d0db36be/testrun/20257175/suite/kunit/test/req_alloc/log
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.5.y/build/v6.5.5-322-g9327d0db36be/testrun/20257175/suite/kunit/test/req_alloc/details/
>  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/
>  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/config
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> # To install tuxrun to your home directory at ~/.local/bin:
> # pip3 install -U --user tuxrun==0.49.2
> #
> # Or install a deb/rpm depending on the running distribution
> # See https://tuxmake.org/install-deb/ or
> # https://tuxmake.org/install-rpm/
> #
> # See https://tuxrun.org/ for complete documentation.
> Link to reproducer,
> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/tuxmake_reproducer.sh
> 
> or
> 
> tuxrun --runtime podman --device qemu-armv7 --boot-args rw --kernel
> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/zImage
> --modules https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/modules.tar.xz
> --rootfs https://storage.tuxboot.com/debian/bookworm/armhf/rootfs.ext4.xz
> --parameters SKIPFILE=skipfile-lkft.yaml --image
> docker.io/linaro/tuxrun-dispatcher:v0.49.2 --tests kunit --timeouts
> boot=30
> 
> 
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org
>