[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3cwcfx7fvtr75j6musdqttn6oto4wemsx7lh664gu3run6wxnz@5o5vao4wibm5>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 10:43:14 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: wens@...e.org, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
samuel@...lland.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] drm/sun4i: dw-hdmi: Split driver registration
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:07:45PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Dne ponedeljek, 25. september 2023 ob 09:47:15 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a):
> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 09:26:02PM +0200, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > > There is no reason to register two drivers in same place. Using macro
> > > lowers amount of boilerplate code.
> >
> > There's one actually: you can't have several module_init functions in
> > the some module, and both files are compiled into the same module.
>
> Yeah, I figured as much. However, I think code clean up is good enough reason
> to add hidden option in Kconfig and extra entry in Makefile (in v2).
>
> Do you agree?
Yeah, I don't know. Adding more modules makes it more difficult to
handle (especially autoloading) without a clear argument why.
Module_init is simple enough as it is currently, maybe we should just
add a comment to make it clearer?
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists