lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2023 12:40:41 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     Florian Eckert <fe@....tdt.de>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Eckert.Florian@...glemail.com, pavel@....cz, kabel@...nel.org,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] trigger: ledtrig-tty: move variable definition to
 the top

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 11:13:07AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2023, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:36:09AM +0200, Florian Eckert wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > I decided to move the variable definition with a separate commit
> > > > > to the top of the function, to make the build robot happy. After that
> > > > > I made my changes for v2 to the ledtrig-tty to add the feature.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Ah, lkp, then also the Closes: line as it suggests.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sorry I do not understand your statement
> > > > 
> > > > The link you pasted above states:
> > > > =======
> > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new
> > > > version of
> > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > > | Closes:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270440.IJB24Xap-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > =======
> > > > 
> > > > So please follow that suggestion ;).
> > > 
> > > Ok, I understand, thanks will to this on a v3 patchset.
> > > I will now wait for the comments of my changes in ledtrig-tty from the led
> > > subsystem.
> > > And then I will send a new patch set with the requested changes.
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the silly question. But do I have to send this patch again for a
> > > v3?
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/f41dc1e1-6d34-48b2-97dd-ba67df6003c6@kernel.org/T/#u
> > > It was already marked by you with a `Reviewed-by:` from you?
> 
> Yes please.  I will pick this up as a set once it's ready.
> 
> > This series is long gone from my review queue, so a v3 will be needed at
> > the very least.
> 
> Nothing for Greg to worry about here (unless you *want* to review).

Yes, I want to ensure that the tty change is correct, last round I
didn't think it was...

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ