linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: selftests: x86: sync_regs_test: Use vcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231005143839.365297-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu,  5 Oct 2023 16:38:33 +0200
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: selftests: x86: sync_regs_test: Use vcpu_run() where appropriate

In the spots where we are expecting a successful run, we should
use vcpu_run() instead of _vcpu_run() to make sure that the run
did not fail.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
index 00965ba33f730..8c3898cf79b31 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	/* Request and verify all valid register sets. */
 	/* TODO: BUILD TIME CHECK: TEST_ASSERT(KVM_SYNC_X86_NUM_FIELDS != 3); */
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 
 	vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, &regs);
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
 	run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_X86_REGS | KVM_SYNC_X86_SREGS;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBAD1DEA + 1,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
 	run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
 	run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xDEADBEEF;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx != 0xDEADBEEF,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xAAAA;
 	regs.rbx = 0xBAC0;
 	vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, &regs);
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xAAAA,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
 	run->kvm_dirty_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
 	run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xBBBB;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBBBB,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
-- 
2.41.0