[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsqbZhSQnEi-qSc7n+4d7nPap8HWcdbZGWLfo3mTH-L7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 22:09:57 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.com>,
Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
NFS mounted rootfs.
and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
LTP hugetlb tests failed log
tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
LTP dio tests failed log
compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
offset 4096: 0x00 .
diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
infile and outfile
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.56-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 0353a7bfd2b60c5e42c8651eb3fa4cc48159db5f
* git describe: v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)
* x86_64-clang, ltp-hugetlb
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-hugetlb
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-hugetlb
- hugemmap11
Test log:
--------
tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20259639/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/log
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260457/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/history/
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-dio
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-dio
- dio01
- dio02
- dio03
- dio05
- dio06
- dio07
- dio08
- dio09
- dio11
Test log:
--------
compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
offset 4096: 0x00 .
diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
infile and outfile
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
diotest02 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest02 2 TFAIL : diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
diotest02 3 TFAIL : diotest2.c:210: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest02 4 TFAIL : diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
diotest02 5 TFAIL : diotest2.c:231: Read, Write with Direct IO
diotest02 0 TINFO : 2/3 testblocks failed
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:189: Write Direct-child 0 failed
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
diotest03 4 TFAIL : diotest3.c:210: RDWR Direct-child 0 failed
diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:323: Read, Write with Direct IO
...
diotest05 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest05 2 TFAIL : diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
diotest05 3 TFAIL : diotest5.c:250: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest05 4 TFAIL : diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
diotest05 5 TFAIL : diotest5.c:271: Read, Write with Direct IO
diotest05 0 TINFO : 2/3 testblocks failed
Links:
- https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6842177#L1666
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260389/suite/ltp-dio/test/dio01/history/
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)
## Test result summary
total: 121166, pass: 102582, fail: 2234, skip: 16177, xfail: 173
## Build Summary
* arc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 140 total, 140 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 49 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists