[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231005165230.GA1247-beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 09:52:30 -0700
From: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cleger@...osinc.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/user_events: Fix abi_test for BE archs
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 11:08:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 08:48:14 -0600
> Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Hmm. Which tree is this patch based on? This doesn't apply to
> > linux-kselftest fixes - I thought this was based on top of fixes
> > since I sent in a fix for Linux 6.6-rc4 for user_events
> >
> > Beau, Please rebase to the correct tree/branch and send v2 for
> > this patch.
>
> Hmm, so this didn't apply to my tree nor yours.
>
> Beau, can you verify which tree this goes to?
>
> -- Steve
It was based on tracing/for-next.
I'll get a v2 out rebased upon linux-kselftest, does that work?
Thanks,
-Beau
Powered by blists - more mailing lists