[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231006-fix-realtek-warnings-v1-2-09af253312ba@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 23:04:19 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Tzuyi Chang <tychang@...ltek.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: realtek: Fix some NULL dereference warnings
Just inspecting the code doesn't convince me that this is a real
issue, but the tools complain that it is so I will just handle it.
Cc: Tzuyi Chang <tychang@...ltek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270234.aJGlDE0P-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd.c
index bafe27face80..fc27e4f61be1 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd.c
@@ -165,7 +165,10 @@ static int rtd_pinctrl_set_one_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pcdev,
return 0;
if (!mux->functions) {
- dev_err(pcdev->dev, "No functions available for pin %s\n", mux->name);
+ if (!mux->name)
+ dev_err(pcdev->dev, "NULL pin has no functions\n");
+ else
+ dev_err(pcdev->dev, "No functions available for pin %s\n", mux->name);
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
@@ -177,6 +180,11 @@ static int rtd_pinctrl_set_one_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pcdev,
return ret;
}
+ if (!mux->name) {
+ dev_err(pcdev->dev, "NULL pin provided for function %s\n", func_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
dev_err(pcdev->dev, "No function %s available for pin %s\n", func_name, mux->name);
return -EINVAL;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists