linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] sched/fair: Avoid unnecessary IPIs for ILB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+HDTgSnab1eTWkFX-E9Yjvd8R3Apw4PyqbBHnYYg246Va1zYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 17:20:41 -0400
From:   Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@...gle.com>
To:     Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
        Hsin Yi <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched/fair: Avoid unnecessary IPIs for ILB

Hi Shrikanth,

> Hi Joel/Vineeth.
>
> Its an interesting patch.
>
> Gave this patch a try on powerpc system with 96 CPU. (12 cores SMT8)
> Was debugging an issue where ILB count goes up significantly at a specific
> busy CPU count. Haven't yet found out why. Its WIP. Was curious if this patch
> would address that issue.
>
Increased SCHED_SOFTIRQ was another problem that we noticed and we
have a separate fix for that in the chromeos tree. We were planning to
send the patch after a bit more testing. You could try the patch and
see if it solves the problem that you are seeing:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/918f229ba2ff720f5dfae4768469acbb6ea39fe2

Thanks