[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6520971d.a70a0220.758e3.8cf7@mx.google.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 02:24:05 +0300
From: Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+fae676d3cf469331fc89@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+b132693e925cbbd89e26@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
bjorn@...nel.org, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, ast@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3] net/xdp: fix zero-size allocation warning in
xskq_create()
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:37:44AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
[...]
> > > What if "size" is SIZE_MAX-1? Would it still overflow the PAGE_ALIGN below?
> > >
> > > > + kfree(q);
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> > > > q->ring = vmalloc_user(size);
> > >
> >
> > I asked myself the same question before v1. E.g. thinking about the
> > check: (size > SIZE_MAX - PAGE_SIZE + 1)
> >
> > But xskq_create() is called after the check for
> > !is_power_of_2(entries) in xsk_init_queue(). So I tried the same
> > reproducer and divided the (nentries) value by 2 in a loop - it hits
> > either SIZE_MAX case or the normal cases without overflow (sometimes
> > throwing vmalloc error complaining about size which exceed total pages
> > in my arm setup).
> >
> > So I can't see a way size will be SIZE_MAX-1, etc. Correct me if I'm
> > wrong, please.
> >
> > PS: In the output below the first 2 values of (nentries) hit SIZE_MAX
>
> Thanks for the explanation, so iiuc it means it will overflow the
> struct_size() first because of the is_power_of_2(nentries) requirement?
> Could you help adding some comment to explain? Thanks.
>
The overflow happens because there's no upper limit for nentries
(userspace input). Let me add more context, e.g. from net/xdp/xsk.c:
static int xsk_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
{
[...]
if (copy_from_sockptr(&entries, optval, sizeof(entries)))
return -EFAULT;
[...]
err = xsk_init_queue(entries, q, false);
[...]
}
'entries' is passed to xsk_init_queue() and there're 2 checks: for 0
and is_power_of_2() only, no upper bound check:
static int xsk_init_queue(u32 entries, struct xsk_queue **queue,
bool umem_queue)
{
struct xsk_queue *q;
if (entries == 0 || *queue || !is_power_of_2(entries))
return -EINVAL;
q = xskq_create(entries, umem_queue);
if (!q)
return -ENOMEM;
[...]
}
The 'entries' value is next passed to struct_size() in
net/xdp/xsk_queue.c. If it's large enough - SIZE_MAX will be returned.
I'm not sure if some appropriate limit for the size of XDP_RX_RING /
XDP_TX_RING and XDP_UMEM_FILL_RING / XDP_UMEM_COMPLETION_RING rings
should be used. But anyway, vmalloc() will tell if it's not ok with
the requested allocation size.
--
Andrew Kanner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists