[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <864jj4njb7.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 11:20:44 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW
On Thu, 05 Oct 2023 11:27:26 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> 3) Partial fix: make the ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING cpucap depend on the
> absence of a "mediatek,broken-save-restore-fw" property in the DT. I believe
> we can check that in early_enable_pseudo_nmi() or can_use_gic_priorities().
>
> That'll avoid potential issues if/when we change the priorities used for
> pNMI (which is something I've been looking at).
>
> I'm happy with (3) if Marc is.
Definitely worth investigating if you have the bandwidth.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists