[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZR_6Wl_pNbdF9M-k@sashalap>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 08:15:22 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/183] 5.15.134-rc1 review
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:03:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 04:07:14PM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/10/23 3:55 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> > > On 10/4/23 10:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.134 release.
>> > > > There are 183 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > > > let me know.
>> > > >
>> > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
>> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> > > >
>> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.134-rc1.gz
>> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
>> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> > > >
>> > > > thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > greg k-h
>> > >
>> > > perf fails to build with:
>> > >
>> > > CC /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.o
>> > > util/metricgroup.c: In function 'metricgroup__parse_groups':
>> > > util/metricgroup.c:1261:7: error: 'table' undeclared (first use in this
>> > > function)
>> > > if (!table)
>> > > ^~~~~
>> > > util/metricgroup.c:1261:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
>> > > once for each function it appears in
>> > > make[6]: *** [/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.o]
>> > > Error 1
>> > >
>> > > caused by c1ef510a0f2a879bf29ddebae766ec9f0790eb8f ("perf metric: Return
>> > > early if no CPU PMU table exists"). Dropping this commit allows the build to
>> > > continue.
>> > >
>> > > I had reported in the previous cycle that 00facc760903be66 ("perf jevents:
>> > > Switch build to use jevents.py") was causing build failures:
>> > >
>> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a577578-8adb-aa70-1bf8-b1a4573152cf@gmail.com/
>> > >
>> > > do we still want these commits to be included?
>> >
>> > No, I'll go drop them now, thanks for the report.
>>
>> Thought:
>> It's not the first time we see build failures in tools/perf -- would it make
>> sense to add this to your own build tests to reduce the round trip time for
>> these errors ?
>
>Last time I tried to build perf, I couldn't do it at all so I just gave
>up trying to test for it :)
Same... I've also removed perf from AUTOSEL for that reason.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists