lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAQKjZNn4RTJ-SHHEugcQoS2U9fzNTOGtUpSLLM0w1V6Pb0amw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 11:19:54 +0900
From:   Inki Dae <daeinki@...il.com>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        sw0312.kim@...sung.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 09/12] drm/exynos: Call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown()
 at shutdown/unbind time

Thanks for testing. :)

Acked-by : Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>

2023년 9월 22일 (금) 오후 3:00, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>님이 작성:
>
>
> On 21.09.2023 21:26, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > Based on grepping through the source code this driver appears to be
> > missing a call to drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at system shutdown time
> > and at driver unbind time. Among other things, this means that if a
> > panel is in use that it won't be cleanly powered off at system
> > shutdown time.
> >
> > The fact that we should call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in the case
> > of OS shutdown/restart and at driver remove (or unbind) time comes
> > straight out of the kernel doc "driver instance overview" in
> > drm_drv.c.
> >
> > A few notes about this fix:
> > - When adding drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() to the unbind path, I added
> >    it after drm_kms_helper_poll_fini() since that's when other drivers
> >    seemed to have it.
> > - Technically with a previous patch, ("drm/atomic-helper:
> >    drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(NULL) should be a noop"), we don't
> >    actually need to check to see if our "drm" pointer is NULL before
> >    calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). We'll leave the "if" test in,
> >    though, so that this patch can land without any dependencies. It
> >    could potentially be removed later.
> > - This patch also makes sure to set the drvdata to NULL in the case of
> >    bind errors to make sure that shutdown can't access freed data.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> Seems to be working fine on all my test Exynos-based boards with display.
>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>
> > ---
> > This commit is only compile-time tested.
> >
> > (no changes since v1)
> >
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > index 8399256cb5c9..5380fb6c55ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> >       drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> >       exynos_drm_cleanup_dma(drm);
> >       kfree(private);
> > +     dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> >   err_free_drm:
> >       drm_dev_put(drm);
> >
> > @@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static void exynos_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
> >       drm_dev_unregister(drm);
> >
> >       drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
> > +     drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> >
> >       component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
> >       drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> > @@ -350,9 +352,18 @@ static int exynos_drm_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +static void exynos_drm_platform_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct drm_device *drm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +     if (drm)
> > +             drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static struct platform_driver exynos_drm_platform_driver = {
> >       .probe  = exynos_drm_platform_probe,
> >       .remove = exynos_drm_platform_remove,
> > +     .shutdown = exynos_drm_platform_shutdown,
> >       .driver = {
> >               .name   = "exynos-drm",
> >               .pm     = &exynos_drm_pm_ops,
>
> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ