lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSAr-SSaZcsIoC2P@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 17:47:05 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_ppratap@...cinc.com, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com,
        quic_jackp@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/3] Add multiport support for DWC3 controllers

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 02:32:54PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
> On 10/5/2023 12:06 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:29:19PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:

> >> Krishna Kurapati (3):
> >>    usb: dwc3: core: Access XHCI address space temporarily to read port
> >>      info
> >>    usb: dwc3: core: Skip setting event buffers for host only controllers
> >>    usb: dwc3: qcom: Add helper function to request threaded IRQ
> > 
> > NAK.
> > 
> > These patches make very little sense on their own and can't really be
> > evaluated without the context of the larger series.
> > 
> > Just work on getting the multiport series in shape and include any acks
> > you've received so far when submitting new revisions.

>   This may be partially true for first patch of this series, (where we 
> read num_ports), but the other two patches are self explanatory and are 
> applicable for non-mp controllers as well. Intention was to ensure we 
> make the next rebase easy.

No, just send the whole series at once.
 
>   Will try to address all comments and send v12 again as a whole series 
> this week. I am actually blocked on [1]. Not able to repro the compile 
> error on my end. That's what stopped me from sending all at once.

Looks like your buffer is too small for a u8 index. Should be easy to
fix.

Johan
 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202309200156.CxQ3yaLY-lkp@intel.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ