linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 5/7] nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231006183337.18c285e2@xps-13>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 18:33:37 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Cc:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/7] nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular
 devices

Hi Rafał,

rafal@...ecki.pl wrote on Fri, 06 Oct 2023 13:49:49 +0200:

> On 2023-10-05 17:59, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > +static struct bus_type nvmem_layout_bus_type = {
> > +	.name		= "nvmem-layouts",
> > +	.match		= nvmem_layout_bus_match,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct device nvmem_layout_bus = {
> > +	.init_name	= "nvmem-layouts",
> > +};  
> 
> Nitpicking: would it be more consistent and still make sense to use
> singular form "nvmem-layout"?
> 
> By looking at my /sys/bus/ I can see there:
> 1. cpu (not cpus)
> 2. gpio (not gpios)
> 3. node (not nodes)
> 4. nvmem (not nvmems)
> etc.
> 

Probably, yes. I will wait for more feedback on this series but I'm
fine with the renaming you proposed, makes sense.

Thanks,
Miquèl