linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] dt-bindings: mips: Add bindings for Mobileye SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231006165035.GA4049125-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 11:50:35 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...el.com>,
        Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] dt-bindings: mips: Add bindings for Mobileye SoCs

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 04:55:08PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hello Rob,
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:11 AM Gregory CLEMENT
> > <gregory.clement@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Add the yaml bindings for Mobileye SoCs. Currently only EyeQ5 is
> >> supported
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/mips/mobileye.yaml    | 36 +++++++++
> >>  include/dt-bindings/soc/mobileye,eyeq5.h      | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mobileye.yaml
> >>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/soc/mobileye,eyeq5.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mobileye.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mobileye.yaml
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..f47767bc2c8f
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mobileye.yaml
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause
> >
> > Use what checkpatch tells you.
> 
> >From my point of view GPL-2.0-or-later is compatible with GPL-2.0-only,
> but OK I will do this.

GPL-2.0-only is compatible with GPL3, so why does that matter? And MIT 
is compatible with BSD-2-Clause, but we don't include that. 

Are we okay with GPLv4, v5, ...?

What I really care about is having a free-for-all and having a 
proliferation of different licenses and combinations of licenses under 
bindings. If everyone paid attention, then I wouldn't care. But they 
don't and just copy code around. We already have a license mess with DT 
headers and .dts files. Besides the copying problem, it is not hard to 
find GPL only license included in dual or BSD/MIT only licensed .dts 
files. Seems like an issue to me.

Rob