[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfac65fcd5df18fd31db4b0d326b0dec48ae88e1.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 06:16:21 +0000
From: Irui Wang (王瑞) <Irui.Wang@...iatek.com>
To: "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com" <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
"hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl" <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Yunfei Dong (董云飞)
<Yunfei.Dong@...iatek.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Maoguang Meng (孟毛广)
<Maoguang.Meng@...iatek.com>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle encoder vsi NULL
pointer case
Dear Angelo, Hans,
Thanks for your reviewing.
I will send patch v2 with Fix tag...
....
On Thu, 2023-10-05 at 10:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> On 26/09/2023 12:19, Irui Wang wrote:
> > There will be a kernel null pointer exception if 'vsi' is NULL,
> check
> > 'vsi' is not NULL before assign it to encoder instance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_h264_if.c | 5
> +++++
> > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_vp8_if.c | 5
> +++++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_h264_if.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_h264_if.c
> > index a68dac72c4e4..385bcc0d14f3 100644
> > ---
> a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_h264_if.c
> > +++
> b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_h264_if.c
> > @@ -597,6 +597,11 @@ static int h264_enc_init(struct
> mtk_vcodec_enc_ctx *ctx)
> > inst->hw_base = mtk_vcodec_get_reg_addr(inst->ctx->dev->reg_base,
> VENC_SYS);
> >
> > ret = vpu_enc_init(&inst->vpu_inst);
> > +if (!inst->vpu_inst.vsi) {
> > +mtk_venc_err(ctx, "share buffer is NULL");
> > +kfree(inst);
> > +return -EFAULT;
> > +}
>
> Shouldn't this check be done in vpu_enc_init?
> It looks weird that a function can return 0, but there is still an
> error that needs to be checked manually afterwards.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
Also, this check will move into vpu_enc_init.
Best Regards
>
> >
> > if (MTK_ENC_IOVA_IS_34BIT(ctx))
> > inst->vsi_34 = (struct venc_h264_vsi_34 *)inst->vpu_inst.vsi;
> > diff --git
> a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_vp8_if.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_vp8_if.c
> > index 05abca91e742..23ca0d93324f 100644
> > ---
> a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_vp8_if.c
> > +++
> b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_vp8_if.c
> > @@ -326,6 +326,11 @@ static int vp8_enc_init(struct
> mtk_vcodec_enc_ctx *ctx)
> > inst->hw_base = mtk_vcodec_get_reg_addr(inst->ctx->dev->reg_base,
> VENC_LT_SYS);
> >
> > ret = vpu_enc_init(&inst->vpu_inst);
> > +if (!inst->vpu_inst.vsi) {
> > +mtk_venc_err(ctx, "share buffer is NULL");
> > +kfree(inst);
> > +return -EFAULT;
> > +}
> >
> > inst->vsi = (struct venc_vp8_vsi *)inst->vpu_inst.vsi;
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists