[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023100755-livestock-barcode-fe41@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 10:58:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.com>,
Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:42:04PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
> > NFS mounted rootfs.
> > and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
> > LTP hugetlb tests failed log
> > tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
> > tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
> >
> > LTP dio tests failed log
> > compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
> > offset 4096: 0x00 .
> > diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> > infile and outfile
>
> Bisection led to "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues" (upstream commit
> 7c6339322ce0c6128acbe36aacc1eeb986dd7bf1). Reverting that patch and
> "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling" (upstream
> commit 954998b60caa8f2a3bf3abe490de6f08d283687a) (not a clean revert
> this one) made ltp-dio pass again.
So this is also an issue in Linus's tree? Or is it only on the 6.1.y
tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists