[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231007-kennel-lustily-59b0a9867aaa@spud>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 12:04:25 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
Cc: Chen Wang <unicornxw@...il.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
chao.wei@...hgo.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, guoren@...nel.org,
jszhang@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com, apatel@...tanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Add Milk-V Pioneer RISC-V board support
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:58:51PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>
> On 2023/10/7 18:17, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 03:52:04PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> > > From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
> > >
> > > Milk-V Pioneer [1] is a developer motherboard based on SOPHON SG2042 [2]
> > > in a standard mATX form factor. Add minimal device
> > > tree files for the SG2042 SOC and the Milk-V Pioneer board.
> > >
> > > Now only support basic uart drivers to boot up into a basic console.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chen
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v5:
> > > The patch series is based on v6.6-rc1. You can simply review or test
> > > the patches at the link [7].
> > > - dts: changed plic to support external interrupt
> > > - pickup improvements from Conor, details refer to [8].
> > Did you? I only see them partially picked up. I'll just replace patch 8
> > with the patch 8 from this series I think.
>
> Yes, only the patch 8 of this series(v5) is updated for plic node. For other
> patches, I just cherry-picked them from previous "sophon" branch.
But added my signoff? I ended up seeing my signoff on the patch where I
disagreed with the commit message, which was confusing to me.
> BTW, what I did this time may be a bit redundant. I would like to ask, if I
> encounter a similar situation in the future (that is, only one patch needs
> to be modified, and the others remain unchanged), is there a better way to
> submit the patchset?
You could have sent the plic change as a incremental change on top. So a
new patch with just that one change in it.
Thanks,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists