[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231007113541.8365-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 19:35:41 +0800
From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
To: tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com
Cc: qiang.zhang1211@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Use the kmem_cache_free() instead of kfree() to release pwq
The pwq objects is allocated by kmem_cache_alloc(), this commit therefore
use kmem_cache_free() instead of kfree() to release pwq objects and also
make use the correct tracepoint("trace_kmem_cache_free") to trace the
release of pwq.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index ebe24a5e1435..6f74cab2bd5a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4610,8 +4610,12 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
enomem:
if (wq->cpu_pwq) {
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu));
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq = *per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
+
+ if (pwq)
+ kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
+ }
free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwq);
wq->cpu_pwq = NULL;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists