lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023100722-stallion-unquote-a3b1@gregkh>
Date:   Sat, 7 Oct 2023 18:31:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/7] nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular
 devices

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 05:59:05PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/internals.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/internals.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,30 @@ struct nvmem_device {
>  	nvmem_reg_read_t	reg_read;
>  	nvmem_reg_write_t	reg_write;
>  	struct gpio_desc	*wp_gpio;
> +	struct device		*layout_dev;
>  	struct nvmem_layout	*layout;
>  	void *priv;
>  };

Wait, is this now 2 struct device in the same structure?  Which one is
the "real" owner of this structure?  Why is a pointer to layout_dev
needed here as a "struct device" and not a real "struct
nvmem_layout_device" or whatever it's called?

>  struct nvmem_layout {
> -	const char *name;
> -	const struct of_device_id *of_match_table;
> +	struct device *dev;

Shouldn't this be a "real" struct device and not just a pointer?  If
not, what does this point to?  Who owns the reference to it?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ