lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW72zSALeSk96QAdq4cHf=y_n13MOBmxH-dTUKjkbc_jig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 19:40:52 -0700
From:   Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     xni@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
        yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 00/25] md: synchronize io with array reconfiguration

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 7:32 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2023/10/05 11:55, Song Liu 写道:
> > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 8:42 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 在 2023/09/29 3:15, Song Liu 写道:
> >>> Hi Kuai,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the patchset!
> >>>
> >>> A few high level questions/suggestions:
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for these!
> >>>
> >>> 1. This is a big change that needs a lot of explanation. While you managed to
> >>> keep each patch relatively small (great job btw), it is not very clear why we
> >>> need these changes. Specifically, we are adding a new mutex, it is worth
> >>> mentioning why we cannot achieve the same goal without it. Please add
> >>> more information in the cover letter. We will put part of the cover letter in
> >>> the merge commit.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I realize that I explain too little. I will add background and
> >> design.
> >>>
> Can you take a look about this new cover letter?

I don't have time right now to look into all the details, but it looks
great at first glance. We can still edit it a little bit when applying the
patchset, but that may not be necessary.

Thanks,
Song

>
> ##### Backgroud
>
> Our testers started to test raid10 last year, and we found that there
> are lots of problem in the following test scenario:
>
> - add or remove disks to the array
> - issue io to the array

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ