[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ce9d59e-0938-4448-8279-b8c6e522b26a@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 12:40:29 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Saravanan Sekar <saravanan@...umiz.com>
Cc: sravanhome@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] regulator: dt-bindings: Add mps,mpq2286
power-management IC
On 08/10/2023 03:20, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 10:28:02PM +0530, Saravanan Sekar wrote:
>> Document mpq2286 power-management IC. Instead of simple 'buck', 'buck0' is
>> used to keep the driver common which handles multiple regulators.
>
> Sorry for the maybe dumb question, but where can I find the driver
> depencency on buck naming ?
I guess it is because:
PMBUS_REGULATOR_STEP("buck", 0, MPQ7932_N_VOLTAGES,
creates regulator name as buck+id (so buck0).
However as Rob pointed out, driver can handle buck for this variant. We
want the bindings to be independent from Linux implementation and this
patch here adds such dependency.
Therefore I still believe this should be just "buck", unless the
datasheet says it is "buck0". Which I doubt.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists