| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZSQvMr3-lY9uTzn_@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 09:49:54 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: add options and frags to xdp_hw_metadata
On 10/09, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> This is a follow-up to the commit 9b2b86332a9b ("bpf: Allow to use kfunc
> XDP hints and frags together").
>
> The are some possible implementations problems that may arise when
> providing metadata specifically for multi-buffer packets, therefore there
> must be a possibility to test such option separately.
>
> Add an option to use multi-buffer AF_XDP xdp_hw_metadata and mark used XDP
> program as capable to use frags.
>
> As for now, xdp_hw_metadata accepts no options, so add simple option
> parsing logic and a help message.
>
> For quick reference, also add an ingress packet generation command to the
> help message. The command comes from [0].
>
> Example of output for multi-buffer packet:
>
> xsk_ring_cons__peek: 1
> 0xead018: rx_desc[15]->addr=10000000000f000 addr=f100 comp_addr=f000
> rx_hash: 0x5789FCBB with RSS type:0x29
> rx_timestamp: 1696856851535324697 (sec:1696856851.5353)
> XDP RX-time: 1696856843158256391 (sec:1696856843.1583)
> delta sec:-8.3771 (-8377068.306 usec)
> AF_XDP time: 1696856843158413078 (sec:1696856843.1584)
> delta sec:0.0002 (156.687 usec)
> 0xead018: complete idx=23 addr=f000
> xsk_ring_cons__peek: 1
> 0xead018: rx_desc[16]->addr=100000000008000 addr=8100 comp_addr=8000
> 0xead018: complete idx=24 addr=8000
> xsk_ring_cons__peek: 1
> 0xead018: rx_desc[17]->addr=100000000009000 addr=9100 comp_addr=9000 EoP
> 0xead018: complete idx=25 addr=9000
>
> Metadata is printed for the first packet only.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230119221536.3349901-18-sdf@google.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 63d7de6c6bbb..8767d919c881 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, __u32 *hash,
> enum xdp_rss_hash_type *rss_type) __ksym;
>
> -SEC("xdp")
> +SEC("xdp.frags")
> int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> {
> void *data, *data_meta, *data_end;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 17c980138796..25225720346b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/sockios.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <net/if.h>
> +#include <ctype.h>
> #include <poll.h>
> #include <time.h>
>
> @@ -49,19 +50,29 @@ struct xsk {
> struct xdp_hw_metadata *bpf_obj;
> struct xsk *rx_xsk;
> const char *ifname;
> +bool use_frags;
> int ifindex;
> int rxq;
>
> void test__fail(void) { /* for network_helpers.c */ }
>
> -static int open_xsk(int ifindex, struct xsk *xsk, __u32 queue_id)
> +static struct xsk_socket_config gen_socket_config(void)
> {
> - int mmap_flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE;
> - const struct xsk_socket_config socket_config = {
> + struct xsk_socket_config socket_config = {
> .rx_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
> .tx_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
> .bind_flags = XDP_COPY,
> };
> +
> + if (use_frags)
> + socket_config.bind_flags |= XDP_USE_SG;
> + return socket_config;
> +}
nit: why not drop const from socket_config and add this 'if (use_frags)'
directly to open_xsk? Not sure separate function really buys us anything?
> +static int open_xsk(int ifindex, struct xsk *xsk, __u32 queue_id)
> +{
> + int mmap_flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE;
> + struct xsk_socket_config socket_config = gen_socket_config();
> const struct xsk_umem_config umem_config = {
> .fill_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
> .comp_size = XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
> @@ -263,11 +274,14 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd, clockid_t
> verify_skb_metadata(server_fd);
>
> for (i = 0; i < rxq; i++) {
> + bool first_seg = true;
> + bool is_eop = true;
> +
> if (fds[i].revents == 0)
> continue;
>
> struct xsk *xsk = &rx_xsk[i];
> -
> +peek:
> ret = xsk_ring_cons__peek(&xsk->rx, 1, &idx);
> printf("xsk_ring_cons__peek: %d\n", ret);
> if (ret != 1)
> @@ -276,12 +290,19 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd, clockid_t
> rx_desc = xsk_ring_cons__rx_desc(&xsk->rx, idx);
> comp_addr = xsk_umem__extract_addr(rx_desc->addr);
> addr = xsk_umem__add_offset_to_addr(rx_desc->addr);
> - printf("%p: rx_desc[%u]->addr=%llx addr=%llx comp_addr=%llx\n",
> - xsk, idx, rx_desc->addr, addr, comp_addr);
> - verify_xdp_metadata(xsk_umem__get_data(xsk->umem_area, addr),
> - clock_id);
> + is_eop = !(rx_desc->options & XDP_PKT_CONTD);
> + printf("%p: rx_desc[%u]->addr=%llx addr=%llx comp_addr=%llx%s\n",
> + xsk, idx, rx_desc->addr, addr, comp_addr, is_eop ? " EoP" : "");
> + if (first_seg) {
> + verify_xdp_metadata(xsk_umem__get_data(xsk->umem_area, addr),
> + clock_id);
> + first_seg = false;
> + }
> +
> xsk_ring_cons__release(&xsk->rx, 1);
> refill_rx(xsk, comp_addr);
> + if (!is_eop)
> + goto peek;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -404,6 +425,54 @@ static void timestamping_enable(int fd, int val)
> error(1, errno, "setsockopt(SO_TIMESTAMPING)");
> }
>
> +static void print_usage(void)
> +{
> + const char *usage =
> + " Usage: xdp_hw_metadata [OPTIONS] [IFNAME]\n"
> + " Options:\n"
> + " -m Enable multi-buffer XDP for larger MTU\n"
> + " -h Display this help and exit\n\n"
> + " Generate test packets on the other machine with:\n"
> + " echo -n xdp | nc -u -q1 <dst_ip> 9091\n";
nit: any reason we have two spaces in the help description? I don't
think it's a standard practice, so maybe drop them?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists