[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231009172517.GRZSQ3fT05LGgpcW35@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 19:25:17 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Cc: corbet@....net, reinette.chatre@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bagasdotme@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, jarkko@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/10] x86/resctrl: Unwind the errors inside
rdt_enable_ctx()
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 06:54:25PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> rdt_enable_ctx() enables the features provided during resctrl mount.
>
> Additions to rdt_enable_ctx() are required to also modify error paths
> of rdt_enable_ctx() callers to ensure correct unwinding if errors
> are encountered after calling rdt_enable_ctx(). This is error prone.
>
> Introduce rdt_disable_ctx() to refactor the error unwinding of
> rdt_enable_ctx() to simplify future additions. This also simplifies
> cleanup in rdt_kill_sb().
>
> Remove cdp_disable_all() as it is not used anymore after the refactor.
Do not talk about *what* the patch is doing in the commit message - that
should be obvious from the diff itself. Rather, concentrate on the *why*
it needs to be done.
Check your whole series.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists