linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 25/27] x86: enable initial Rust support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 19:37:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, rcvalle@...gle.com,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 25/27] x86: enable initial Rust support

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 06:31:13PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 6:01 PM Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > If the IBT part would be helpful by itself immediately, I can split
> > that out - it's only the KCFI portion that won't currently work.
> 
> Thanks Matthew. I don't think we are in a rush, but if it is not too
> much work to split it, that would be great, instead of adding the
> restriction.
> 
> For retthunk, by the way, I forgot to mention to Greg above that (in
> the original discussion with PeterZ) that I did a quick test back then
> to hack the equivalent of `-mfunction-return=thunk-extern` into
> `rustc` to show that the compiler could use it via LLVM (by passing
> the attribute in the IR). At least at a basic level it seemed to work:
> I got a userspace program to count the times that it went through the
> return thunk. I didn't try to do anything on the kernel side, but at
> least for the compiler side, it seemed OK. So it may be way easier (on
> the compiler side) than the CFI work?

It should hopefully be much easier than CFI, it was a much simpler
change to gcc and clang when it landed.

thanks,

greg k-h