linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] x86/resctrl: Rename rftype flags for consistency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f571145-90ac-45be-9da1-681dc200051e@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:48:38 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
CC:     <corbet@....net>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        <songmuchun@...edance.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        <jmattson@...gle.com>, <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        <sandipan.das@....com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        <james.morse@....com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        <eranian@...gle.com>, <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        <jarkko@...nel.org>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, <peternewman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] x86/resctrl: Rename rftype flags for
 consistency

Hi Boris,

On 10/9/2023 10:19 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 06:54:23PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
>> resctrl associates rftype flags with its files so that files can be chosen
>> based on the resource, whether it is info or base, and if it is control
>> or monitor type file. These flags use the RF_ as well as RFTYPE_ prefixes.
>>
>> Change the prefix to RFTYPE_ for all these flags to be consistent.
>>
>> Add RFTYPE_MON_BASE that will be used in a later patch. RFTYPE_MON_BASE
>> complements existing RFTYPE_CTRL_BASE and represents files
>> belonging to monitoring groups.
> 
> First of all, the concept of "later patch" has no meaning when the
> patches go into git, depending on the listing order.
> 
> Second, why isn't this define added in the patch that's using it?
> 
> A patch needs to be a logically separate, possibly self-contained
> change - remember that.

My apologies here. Babu was following my guidance on this. 

Reinette