[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231009193032.y7vn2bnluqhrfmmy@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 21:30:32 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: Use device_get_match_data()
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 12:29:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Use preferred device_get_match_data() instead of of_match_device() to
> get the driver match data. With this, adjust the includes to explicitly
> include the correct headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c | 8 ++------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 9 ++-------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
> index 326af85888e7..e32b5e8c203d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> u64 val;
> unsigned long clk_rate;
> struct img_pwm_chip *imgchip;
> - const struct of_device_id *of_dev_id;
>
> imgchip = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imgchip), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!imgchip)
> @@ -273,10 +272,7 @@ static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(imgchip->base))
> return PTR_ERR(imgchip->base);
>
> - of_dev_id = of_match_device(img_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> - if (!of_dev_id)
> - return -ENODEV;
> - imgchip->data = of_dev_id->data;
> + imgchip->data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
Is this a semantical change? If there is a match, the code is
equivalent. Otherwise it was:
return -ENODEV;
before and now it's
imgchip->data = NULL;
isn't it?
> imgchip->periph_regs = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
> "img,cr-periph");
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
> index 03ee18fb82d5..339165ef1f07 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
>
> @@ -297,16 +297,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_pwm_dt_ids);
>
> static int rockchip_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - const struct of_device_id *id;
> struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc;
> u32 enable_conf, ctrl;
> bool enabled;
> int ret, count;
>
> - id = of_match_device(rockchip_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> - if (!id)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> pc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pc)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -345,7 +340,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
>
> - pc->data = id->data;
> + pc->data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> pc->chip.ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops;
> pc->chip.npwm = 1;
This has the same semantical change.
If this change is ok, it IMHO needs a more verbose commit log.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists