[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UFa_AoJQvUT3BTiRs19WCA2xLVeQOU=+nYu_HaE0_c6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 13:53:14 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>,
sam@...nborg.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
hsinyi@...gle.com, swboyd@...omium.org, airlied@...il.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v1 0/2] Break out as separate driver from boe-tv101wum-nl6 panel driver
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 12:33 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 8:06 AM Cong Yang
> <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> > Linus series proposed to break out ili9882t as separate driver,
> > but he didn't have time for that extensive rework of the driver.
> > As discussed by Linus and Doug [1], keep macro using the "struct panel_init_cmd"
> > until we get some resolution about the binary size issue.
>
> OK works for me:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Dough, if it looks OK to you too, can you apply the patches?
Thanks for the review. I had a few small comments so I'd expect a v2.
I suspect it would look a little weird to add your Reviewed-by to
patch #1 since the way Cong has it you're the direct patch author. :-P
Cong, I suspect you may want to change the tagging on patch #1. I'd
suggest setting yourself as the patch author (git commit --amend
--reset-author), then tag the first patch like this (I put "x-" first
to make it obvious to any bots reading this that these are not tags to
actually apply--remove that when you tag your patch):
x-Co-developed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
x-Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
x-Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
x-Signed-off-by: Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Also: just as a heads up, Hsin-Yi measured the impact of removing the
"command table" for init and replacing it with a whole pile of direct
function calls. She found that it added over 100K to the driver (!!!).
I believe it went from a 45K driver to a 152K driver. Something to
keep in mind. ;-)
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists