[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zg0ro2ns.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:24:07 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/25] timer: Split out get next timer functionality
On Mon, Oct 09 2023 at 23:15, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:34:38PM +0200, Anna-Maria Behnsen a écrit :
>>
>> + expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
>
> Does that compute KTIME_MAX when there is no timers pending?
Probably not :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists