Message-ID: <20231009230858.3444834-11-rananta@google.com>
Date:   Mon,  9 Oct 2023 23:08:56 +0000
From:   Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
To:     Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
        Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
        Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
        Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 10/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce
 vpmu_counter_access test

From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>

Introduce vpmu_counter_access test for arm64 platforms.
The test configures PMUv3 for a vCPU, sets PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU,
and check if the guest can consistently see the same number of the
PMU event counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets.
This test case is done with each of the PMCR_EL0.N values from
0 to 31 (With the PMCR_EL0.N values greater than the host value,
the test expects KVM_SET_ONE_REG for the PMCR_EL0 to fail).

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
 .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c         | 247 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index a3bb36fb3cfc..416700aa196c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/smccc_filter
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vcpu_width_config
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_init
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_irq
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vpmu_counter_access
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..58949b17d76e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * vpmu_counter_access - Test vPMU event counter access
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
+ *
+ * This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event
+ * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets.
+ * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host.
+ */
+#include <kvm_util.h>
+#include <processor.h>
+#include <test_util.h>
+#include <vgic.h>
+#include <perf/arm_pmuv3.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+
+/* The max number of the PMU event counters (excluding the cycle counter) */
+#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS	(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
+
+struct vpmu_vm {
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	int gic_fd;
+};
+
+static struct vpmu_vm vpmu_vm;
+
+static uint64_t get_pmcr_n(uint64_t pmcr)
+{
+	return (pmcr >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
+}
+
+static void set_pmcr_n(uint64_t *pmcr, uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+	*pmcr = *pmcr & ~(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
+	*pmcr |= (pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
+}
+
+static void guest_sync_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
+{
+	uint64_t esr, ec;
+
+	esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1);
+	ec = (esr >> ESR_EC_SHIFT) & ESR_EC_MASK;
+	__GUEST_ASSERT(0, "PC: 0x%lx; ESR: 0x%lx; EC: 0x%lx", regs->pc, esr, ec);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of
+ * event counters.
+ * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N.
+ */
+static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
+{
+	uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n;
+
+	__GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS,
+			"Expected PMCR.N: 0x%lx; ARMv8 general counters: 0x%lx",
+			expected_pmcr_n, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS);
+
+	pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0);
+	pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n(pmcr);
+
+	/* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */
+	__GUEST_ASSERT(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n,
+			"Expected PMCR.N: 0x%lx, PMCR.N: 0x%lx",
+			pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n);
+
+	GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+#define GICD_BASE_GPA	0x8000000ULL
+#define GICR_BASE_GPA	0x80A0000ULL
+
+/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
+static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+	uint8_t pmuver, ec;
+	uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
+	struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
+		.group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+		.attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
+		.addr = (uint64_t)&irq,
+	};
+	struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = {
+		.group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+		.attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT,
+	};
+
+	/* The test creates the vpmu_vm multiple times. Ensure a clean state */
+	memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
+
+	vpmu_vm.vm = vm_create(1);
+	vm_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vm);
+	for (ec = 0; ec < ESR_EC_NUM; ec++) {
+		vm_install_sync_handler(vpmu_vm.vm, VECTOR_SYNC_CURRENT, ec,
+					guest_sync_handler);
+	}
+
+	/* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
+	vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
+	init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
+	vpmu_vm.vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
+	vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
+	vpmu_vm.gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm.vm, 1, 64,
+					GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
+
+	/* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
+	vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu,
+		     KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0);
+	pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER), dfr0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF &&
+		    pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_0,
+		    "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
+
+	/* Initialize vPMU */
+	vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
+	vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr);
+}
+
+static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void)
+{
+	close(vpmu_vm.gic_fd);
+	kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm.vm);
+}
+
+static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+	struct ucall uc;
+
+	vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, pmcr_n);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
+	case UCALL_ABORT:
+		REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
+		break;
+	case UCALL_DONE:
+		break;
+	default:
+		TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a guest with one vCPU, set the PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU to @pmcr_n,
+ * and run the test.
+ */
+static void run_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	uint64_t sp, pmcr;
+	struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+
+	pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n);
+	create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
+
+	vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
+
+	/* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */
+	vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), &sp);
+
+	/* Update the PMCR_EL0.N with @pmcr_n */
+	vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr);
+	set_pmcr_n(&pmcr, pmcr_n);
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
+
+	run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n);
+
+	/*
+	 * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to
+	 * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved.
+	 */
+	vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
+	init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
+	aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
+	vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu);
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), sp);
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), (uint64_t)guest_code);
+
+	run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n);
+
+	destroy_vpmu_vm();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a guest with one vCPU, and attempt to set the PMCR_EL0.N for
+ * the vCPU to @pmcr_n, which is larger than the host value.
+ * The attempt should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU.
+ */
+static void run_error_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_orig;
+
+	pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n);
+	create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
+	vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
+
+	vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig);
+	pmcr = pmcr_orig;
+
+	/*
+	 * Setting a larger value of PMCR.N should not modify the field, and
+	 * return a success.
+	 */
+	set_pmcr_n(&pmcr, pmcr_n);
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
+	vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr);
+	TEST_ASSERT(pmcr_orig == pmcr,
+		    "PMCR.N modified by KVM to a larger value (PMCR: 0x%lx) for pmcr_n: 0x%lx\n",
+		    pmcr, pmcr_n);
+
+	destroy_vpmu_vm();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return the default number of implemented PMU event counters excluding
+ * the cycle counter (i.e. PMCR_EL0.N value) for the guest.
+ */
+static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void)
+{
+	uint64_t pmcr;
+
+	create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
+	vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr);
+	destroy_vpmu_vm();
+	return get_pmcr_n(pmcr);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+	uint64_t i, pmcr_n;
+
+	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3));
+
+	pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n_limit();
+	for (i = 0; i <= pmcr_n; i++)
+		run_test(i);
+
+	for (i = pmcr_n + 1; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
+		run_error_test(i);
+
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists